Monday, December 15, 2014

My first encounter

Ever since I came across Oliver in early 2011 I was disgusted by what I saw. I engaged him by asking if he was related to Christian Chandler - who since I asked that question has been arraigned before a court in Virginia.

Oliver denied the relationship, which even now I find hard to believe. That is why I decided to start this blog and commenced my long term research. I remarked that he could have fooled me, and he claimed that he doesn't fool people. I called him on that telling him that he's Chris Chan's twin and he denied it again. I told him that I have his birth certificate and he still denied it claiming that he is ten years younger than him. I called him a liar, but he persisted giving his age. I told him that his birth certificate said otherwise, and he gave what he claimed to be his birth date and place, and Chandler's birth date and place. I told him that his birth date and place was the same as Chandler's and he denied it and claimed it was illegal to obtain another person's birth certificate. I told him that a departmental investigation was going on and that's how I got the certificate. He figured I was a cop (wrong) and even that wouldn't be enough to get it. I told him I work for the Health Department, and we have more power than the LAPD. There was no one in our investigation born on the day he claims he was born in any year let alone the year he claimed. He claimed I was lying and that no one can obtain his birth certificate (not true). I told him what the investigation was all about and that the Health Department were preparing to restrain him because of his conduct. He decided on a joke, sneezing because he's allergic to bullshit. I told him he was in for a serious shock and I called him Oliver Canby/Chandler. Again he claimed I was lying and I told him "I know what I know". He then claimed that I was claiming that he was Chandler! I repeated that he was Chandler's twin brother, and he repeated his denial. I told him yet again that I had his real birth certificate and that he had a fake. He claimed that I didn't have any birth certificate at all, and I contradicted him. He contradicted me and I called him on it again, calling him Oliver Canby/Chandler. Again he claimed that I was calling him Chandler! I corrected him yet again, and I told him that he had to admit it, so that he would get the help he needs or it would be forced upon him. He denied it and claimed that it was unconstitutional to force assistance. I informed him that that was not true if the subject was a threat to him (or her) self, only for him to claim that he was not a danger to himself. At that point he locked the thread.

The investigation concluded not long afterwards, and luckily for Oliver we didn't get the permit to force him to get help. There were too many unexplained variables.

So I took it upon myself to look into his behavior and relate it to the Californian Penal Code. That is what this blog is all about. The results of that research, and I have gone back to the start of Oliver's blog and carried through to the present day.

Of Crimes Against Public Justice

It is a criminal offense to commit perjury. Oliver Maxwell Canby has on at least two occasions uttered the words "The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God". These are the exact words used in taking an oath. So if any subsequent statement is proven to be a lie, Oliver Maxwell Canby has committed perjury. Some examples of his lying under oath include (but are not limited to);

a. Asperger's is a disease caused by mercury.
b. It is impossible for autistic people to have sex.
c. God proclaimed me the Messiah on June 29, 1999.
d. Your movement is defined as neurodiversity, the lack of desire for a cure.
e. Neurodiversity was invented in 2006 by Ari Ne'eman.
f. I was saved by Jesus on June 29, 1999.
g. I hung out with a former US Vice President.

Each of these statements are clearly lies under oath and are in clear violation of Chapter 5 Section 118 (a) of the Penal Code. Section 118 (b) is not applicable as more than one person has clearly indicated that the statements are all lies. Any claim to "not knowing" is invalid under Section 123.

It is a felony to falsify evidence. Online, Oliver Maxwell Canby has claimed to possess a graduation document from University High School. A thorough investigation has shown that this document has been forged and is not real. This claim has been brought as evidence in the matter of perjury, and can be established as also false. This is in clear violation of Chapter 6 Section 132 of the Penal Code. Section 133 is also applicable to claims made outside of the oath made, and is a misdemeanor.

It is a misdemeanor to make a false report to police. On no less than four occasions that can be found, Oliver Maxwell Canby made statements indicating reports would be made. Three of these can be confirmed but no action was taken for reasons unknown officially. Chapter 7 Section 148.5 makes it clear that the actions of Oliver Maxwell Canby were a misdemeanor.

Common barratry has been committed on no less than four occasions by Oliver Maxwell Canby in violation of Chapter 7 Section 158 of the Penal Code. Four people - one of them twice - were threatened with groundless judicial proceedings. This exceeds the minimum of three required by Section 159. Oliver Maxwell Canby should have been jailed for six months or fined $1000 for this action.

In all the above instances, Title 1 Section 25 (a) prevents any claim to diminished capacity.

Of Crimes Against The Person

It is a criminal offense to engage in the battery of another person. Battery is also know as assault and is defined under Chapter 9 Section 242 of the Penal Code as "any willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another". Force can include verbal force as well as physical.

Section 243.8 specifies prohibition of such actions against sports officials. On no less than three occasions, Oliver Maxwell Canby has used verbal force towards a sports official in the social media using such violent language that can not and should not be ignored. It is not a defense that the official concerned was in another country. The battery took place immediately before the contest that the sports official was officiating and therefore should be construed as a violation of the section concerned.

In the above instances, Title 1 Section 25 (a) prevents any claim to diminished capacity.

In the above instances, the call for assistance to commit the act is also violation of Title 2 Section 31.

Of Crimes Against The Public Health And Safety

It is a public nuisance to engage in any conduct that is injurious to health. On a number of occasions, Oliver Maxwell Canby promoted the use of chelation to cure the condition of Autism. The use of chelation for this purpose is well established as a health threat and can result in damage to a person's vital organs such as the liver and the kidneys. Title 10 Section 370 is very specific of behavior injurious to health. Section 371 sets no limits on the extent of the damage caused either as a minimum or a maximum so any claim of a small viewing audience to this behavior is irrelevant. Section 372 identifies this conduct as a misdemeanor.

Additionally, Oliver Maxwell Canby has allowed similar behavior by others on social media platforms that he has control over. This is in violation of Section 373a.

Section 395 prohibits slander and libel that affects the value of any kind of property. This includes online platforms such as websites. Oliver Maxwell Canby has libeled no less than three websites that are known, one of which has since been forced to shut down as a direct result of the conduct. This is also a misdemeanor.

Finally, Oliver Maxwell Canby has openly encouraged self-injury to the point of death (also known as suicide) when conversing with two other parties. This is in violation of Section 401 and is a felony. On a technical point but likely not actionable is the claim that a demand for a cure for Autism is suicide. Given that Autism is held to be genetic in origin this contradicts Oliver's stated claim that he opposes abortion. This may save him from this technical point.

In the above instances, Title 1 Section 25 (a) prevents any claim to diminished capacity.

In the above instances, the call for assistance to commit the act is also violation of Title 2 Section 31.

Criminal Threats

I wanted to do this in order of the penal code rather than in order of importance. It is here that Oliver Maxwell Canby is the most guilty.

Title 11.5 Section 422 is very specific of threats of death or great bodily injury to another person. Threats include incitement. On March 12, 2012, Oliver Maxwell Canby issued a very specific threat towards another person by means of an electronic communication device - in this case a computer (via the internet) - and included the target's home address. The threat of death was presented in rather gory detail that I will not repeat, and a bounty was even placed on the target's head. Section 422 also notes that a lack of intent to carry out the threat is irrelevant.

This matter was investigated by the FBI as the target was not in the United States, but the LAPD were aware of it as before. It is staggering that no action was taken, and my information is that the matter was closed when 48 hours later the communication was deleted from the internet and a claim of an "extreme joke" was published. It is my view that Oliver Maxwell should be serving time in a state prison for this.

I understand that the target is taking civil action in the matter and I hope he is successful.

In the above instance, the call for assistance to commit the act is also violation of Title 2 Section 31.

In the above instance, Title 1 Section 25 (a) prevents any claim to diminished capacity.

Civil Rights

Title 11.6 Chapter 2 Section 422.6 of the penal code prohibits any kind of force in the matter of Constitutional rights, both of California and of the United States. I don't have enough fingers or toes to count the number of times Oliver Maxwell Canby has sought to interfere with and oppress the rights of homosexuals to exist, and rights of Autistics to a decent level of care and support. In the case of the latter he has constantly attempted to brow beat several people into accepting that Autism must be cured and that there is no alternative option to this. As previously observed, his preferred treatment is dangerous anyway, but this course of action is additional to that activity. In both cases the protection of persons with an actual or perceived characteristic is required.

In the same section it is also noted that the damage of personal property is also prohibited. This includes personal websites as previously mentioned. Oliver Maxwell Canby has, by use of proxy generators, violated this section in interfering with the smooth operation of another person's website, thereby also restricting the free exercise and enjoyment of a Constitutional right. The general threat of violence of February 2012 renders part (c) of section 422.6 invalid.

Oliver Maxwell Canby should at least have been fined $5000 for this breach and should be performing community service.

In the above instance, Title 1 Section 25 (a) prevents any claim to diminished capacity.

Of Crimes against Property

Forgery is a serious crime as is counterfeiting. Oliver Maxwell Canby has claimed possession of a graduation certificate from the University High School in Los Angeles, California. This claim has been rightly questioned based on it's early issue and consequent investigation has revealed that no such true certificate was issued in the name of the accused. This is in clear violation of Title 13 Chapter 4 Section 470 of the penal code, with the document forged identified under section 470 (d) as "falsifies the acknowledgment of any notary public". University High School certificates include a seal within the meaning of section 472 which adds to the issue canvassed, as does section 483.5 as the certificate also serves as an identifying document with government qualifications. Under section 483.5 the certificate is deemed deceptive.

Section 471.5 identifies any attempt to modify any medical record as a misdemeanor. On four separate occasions, Oliver Maxwell Canby has without any authorization countered legitimate diagnosis results of Autistic Spectrum Disorder. The most recent instance of this misdemeanor was against public personality Susan Boyle.

Larceny covers a number of offenses under Title 13 Chapter 5 Section 502 (c) of the penal code. Oliver Maxwell Canby has committed several. He has knowingly accessed without permission and used data to execute a scheme to deceive and wrongfully control data (sub section (1)), knowingly accessed without permission and taken, copied and made use of data from a computer network (sub section (2)), knowingly and without permission used a computer service (sub section (3)) and knowingly and without permission used a computer service. In each instance a website is involved that includes data, and said website has banned the accused from accessing it. He persisted, violating these sections.

Section 502 (e) allows for the victim to make claims for damages as well as injunctive relief in addition to any other civil relief available. As previously mentioned, the victim is taking civil action. Section 502 (g) requires the impounding of the computer of the accused. No claim can be made under Section 502 (h) as the accused is not employed and as the victim is taking civil action damage has been done presumably.

Investigations have revealed that Oliver Maxwell Canby is also guilty of violating Title 13 Chapter 8 Section 528.5 of the penal code by credibly impersonating three other parties under the guise of another identity known only as "Aspie Hater". For credibility the accused also impersonated himself. Six witnesses have issued statements that they believed the impersonations to be genuine until such time as the three victims stated their innocence in strong and persuasive terms. The accused attempted to shift the blame to his guise before deleting everything. This I believe prevented actual prosecution of the matter.

In the above instances, Title 1 Section 25 (a) prevents any claim to diminished capacity.