Title 14 Section 594 of the penal code prohibits vandalism and identifies "damage" as an example. This can include damaging property by rendering it useless. This would apply to verbally damaging a website, which as previously mentioned Oliver Maxwell Canby has done amongst other penal code violations.
But the core violation of Title 14 comes under section 620 of the penal code. Countless times Oliver Maxwell Canby has altered the purport, effect and meaning, either individually or as a combination, of a telegraphic or telephonic message to the injury of another. The use of the Internet is via a telephonic instrument (a modem) so the accused should be fined multiple times or serve a jail term.
In the above instances, Title 1 Section 25 (a) prevents any claim to diminished capacity.
Monday, December 15, 2014
Miscellaneous Crimes
This is a large section concerning Title 15 of the penal code.
Chapter 1 speaks of schools and Section 626.10 (a) specifically prohibits any knife or like object on school grounds. Oliver Maxwell Canby openly admits a number of years ago to breaching this part of the penal code, using it to threaten in a classroom. This incident led to his expulsion from school. It should also have resulted in criminal charges, although it is possible that because of his age he escaped. However he attempts to blame Autism for this incident, which can not be correct. In the same section under sub section (b) senior educational institutions are also mentioned. Whilst no claim is made to this section, given that no responsibility is taken for the previous incident it should be noted that it is likely that the accused will re-offend. For this reason I call on Oliver Maxwell Canby to be banned from all educational institutions until such time as his psychiatric health is thoroughly checked.
None of the exceptions apply.
Chapter 1.5 speaks of privacy, and the invasion thereof. Section 631 (a) specifically prohibits unauthorized connections without the consent of all parties. The use of proxies is proof of unauthorized connections and as previously mentioned Oliver Maxwell Canby has accessed or connected to a server (an instrument involved in communication for the purpose of this section). He has therefore invaded the privacy of another person. Section 635 prohibits the manufacture of devices intended for spying, and investigations have revealed that the accused also attempted to create his own proxy generator for this exact purpose. Again, telephone lines (corded or not) are a part of Internet communications. Section 637 prohibits the publication of the results of any unauthorized connections, and the accused also violated this section by reprinting data from another location from which he was banned.
Chapter 2 speaks of other offenses, and we start with Section 646.9 (a) - which is an addition to the serious charge already mentioned coming from Title 11.5 Section 422. (c) is also applicable in the terms of prevention of any future repeat of the aforementioned act. Section 646.91 should be applied as apparently the threat has never been revoked, and given that the victim previously mentioned is taking civil action, attempts at stalking may well be made.
Section 653m (a) prohibits intentionally annoying behavior by means of an electronic communication device, and uses obscene language. Oliver Maxwell Canby regularly uses obscene language in his communications and is therefore guilty of a misdemeanor. (b) prohibits repeated contact of an unwelcome nature in similar terms and this has also been done by the accused. There is no evidence of any good faith activity.
Finally, section 653.2 prohibits the publication of personally identifying information for the purpose of placing another person in fear of their safety. This is another addition to the aforementioned criminal threat, in that within that threat the victim's residential address was published.
In the above instances, Title 1 Section 25 (a) prevents any claim to diminished capacity.
Chapter 1 speaks of schools and Section 626.10 (a) specifically prohibits any knife or like object on school grounds. Oliver Maxwell Canby openly admits a number of years ago to breaching this part of the penal code, using it to threaten in a classroom. This incident led to his expulsion from school. It should also have resulted in criminal charges, although it is possible that because of his age he escaped. However he attempts to blame Autism for this incident, which can not be correct. In the same section under sub section (b) senior educational institutions are also mentioned. Whilst no claim is made to this section, given that no responsibility is taken for the previous incident it should be noted that it is likely that the accused will re-offend. For this reason I call on Oliver Maxwell Canby to be banned from all educational institutions until such time as his psychiatric health is thoroughly checked.
None of the exceptions apply.
Chapter 1.5 speaks of privacy, and the invasion thereof. Section 631 (a) specifically prohibits unauthorized connections without the consent of all parties. The use of proxies is proof of unauthorized connections and as previously mentioned Oliver Maxwell Canby has accessed or connected to a server (an instrument involved in communication for the purpose of this section). He has therefore invaded the privacy of another person. Section 635 prohibits the manufacture of devices intended for spying, and investigations have revealed that the accused also attempted to create his own proxy generator for this exact purpose. Again, telephone lines (corded or not) are a part of Internet communications. Section 637 prohibits the publication of the results of any unauthorized connections, and the accused also violated this section by reprinting data from another location from which he was banned.
Chapter 2 speaks of other offenses, and we start with Section 646.9 (a) - which is an addition to the serious charge already mentioned coming from Title 11.5 Section 422. (c) is also applicable in the terms of prevention of any future repeat of the aforementioned act. Section 646.91 should be applied as apparently the threat has never been revoked, and given that the victim previously mentioned is taking civil action, attempts at stalking may well be made.
Section 653m (a) prohibits intentionally annoying behavior by means of an electronic communication device, and uses obscene language. Oliver Maxwell Canby regularly uses obscene language in his communications and is therefore guilty of a misdemeanor. (b) prohibits repeated contact of an unwelcome nature in similar terms and this has also been done by the accused. There is no evidence of any good faith activity.
Finally, section 653.2 prohibits the publication of personally identifying information for the purpose of placing another person in fear of their safety. This is another addition to the aforementioned criminal threat, in that within that threat the victim's residential address was published.
In the above instances, Title 1 Section 25 (a) prevents any claim to diminished capacity.
General Provisions and Conclusion
My final reference is a future reference, and refers to Title 16 Section 668 - which gives power to the courts of California to recognize any criminal or civil conviction that could refer to a violation of the penal code had the offense occurred within California. This includes decisions of other countries. The victim of Oliver Maxwell Canby's criminal threat, as mentioned, is taking civil action and should it be successful and mention is made in the decision of activities that actually violate the penal code of California then any consequent offense would be seen as a second offense as such. I certainly wish the victim all the best, and if he reads this and his action is still to be concluded he could benefit from taking all the above notes into account.
In conclusion, the criminal conduct of Oliver Maxwell Canby is obvious. Christian Chandler is also guilty of criminal conduct and unlike the accused here he has been convicted in Virginia. They are two peas in a pod, and this is not surprising as they are twin brothers. The accused was adopted hence his current name. His birth name is Oliver Maxwell Chandler. I also take note of his claim that he is no longer Autistic as he has engaged in sexual relations. He is definitely a danger to others and a danger to himself with this incredible attitude, given that denial can and has led to more extreme criminal behavior. I cite the matter of Adam Lanza as a prime example of failing to take into account a condition within the meaning of Autism.
It is in Oliver Maxwell Canby/Chandler's best interests to seek help to adjust to his condition. The Health Department is ready and waiting.
In conclusion, the criminal conduct of Oliver Maxwell Canby is obvious. Christian Chandler is also guilty of criminal conduct and unlike the accused here he has been convicted in Virginia. They are two peas in a pod, and this is not surprising as they are twin brothers. The accused was adopted hence his current name. His birth name is Oliver Maxwell Chandler. I also take note of his claim that he is no longer Autistic as he has engaged in sexual relations. He is definitely a danger to others and a danger to himself with this incredible attitude, given that denial can and has led to more extreme criminal behavior. I cite the matter of Adam Lanza as a prime example of failing to take into account a condition within the meaning of Autism.
It is in Oliver Maxwell Canby/Chandler's best interests to seek help to adjust to his condition. The Health Department is ready and waiting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)